Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- meetings:2026-08-23 [2026/08/24 01:22] – [August 23, 2026] denia_g
+++ meetings:2026-08-23 [2026/08/24 03:26] (current) – [August 23, 2026] denia_g
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ====== August 23, 2026 ======
-Present: Aaron, Mikayla, David M. Jamie, Kate, Corey, Bernard, Lorenzo, Reyna, Jill, Jenn W., Don, Ivy Jess, Nick,
+Present: Aaron, Mikayla, David M. Jamie, Kate, Corey, Bernard, Lorenzo, Reyna, Jill, Jenn W., Don, Ivy Jess, Nick, Danzale
 ====== Meet and Greet ======
+no one present for meet and greet.
 ====== Review of Minutes ======
@@ Line 43: / Line 45: @@
 Serenity: we can start with going over how the member review process works?
-Kate goes over the member review process (note to ivy: add in member review process from the wiki)
+Kate: first the reasons for review are read, then the individuals being reviewed are given a chance to respond. next folks can ask clarifying questions, and then when folks feel ready to decide on an option, we ask the members being reviewed to step out of the meeting while members discuss whether they want to vote for a termination of membership (eviction), a behavior contract, or no action. a strawpoll is held to decide between the three outcomes, and in the event eviction is voted for, paper ballots are distributed to vote to evict (75% must vote yes to pass).
-Serenity: the floor is y'alls
+Serenity: the member review reads: "member review for Aaron and Mikayla Palmer for maintaining an uninhabitable living environment that has negatively impacted several neighboring units members' health". the floor is y'alls
 Mikayla: we feel that house policy regarding communication and conflict resolution was not followed, and ask the house to consider options other than eviction as we do not have anywhere else to go. if the house does vote for eviction we will follow legal options to defend ourselves.
@@ Line 136: / Line 138: @@
 voted in favor of eviction, 5 voted in favor of a behavior contract.
+the vote for eviction passed with an 86% majority (13 yes, 2 no, 1 abstain).
+Serenity: we should at least try to give them time to find a place.
+Nick: we need to be specific about that.
+Reyna: they can ask for an extension.
+Corey: a month (30 days) would be the most legally acceptable time, but the shortest we could afford to do is two weeks.
+Ivy: we do know they plan on fighting it in court.
+Jamie: we should do a more defensible date.
+Kate: we can also let them know that from this they will receive a notice to vacate that will not remain on their record unless they do not leave and we have to file an eviction with court.
+Bernard: i am comfortable with a week or two.
+David: what about what they owe? that may come up in court
+Corey: they have been following a verbal payment plan that we approved as a house so it may reflect poorly on us.
+Jamie: how long would a board appeal take?
+David: We are going to have an emergency board meeting on Thursday and i can reach out to them to ask them if they want to appeal.
+Bernard: i think we can start with a week, if they are gonna appeal anyway then they could get a delay.
+David: given the considerations yall have, what time feels reasonable to give them enough time without letting them stay here too long.
+Bernard: they do not care.
+Serenity: I think 2-3 weeks is good
+Jamie: agree, 2-3 weeks is good.
+Danzale: i think 2 weeks.
+strawpoll is held to decide on length of notice to vacate:
+weeks/30 days: 3
+weeks: 12
+weeks: 13
+week: 0
+a vote is held to approve a 2 week notice to vacate for aaron and mikayla palmer
+votes for yes, 0 votes for no, 0 votes for abstain.
 <pagemod addagenda output_before>
@@ Line 146: / Line 200: @@
 ====== New business ======
+Jill: i finally started at a new job thats steady and treats me much better than my previous gigs!